COMPARISON OF SEGMENTATION METHODS USED FOR BONE FRACTURE IMAGES
Yazarlar (2)
S. Butuner
Karabük Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Karabük Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Doç. Dr. Eftal ŞEHİRLİ Karabük Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Bildiri Türü |
Tebliğ/Bildiri
|
Bildiri Dili | İngilizce |
| Bildiri Alt Türü | Tam Metin Olarak Yayınlanan Tebliğ (Uluslararası Kongre/Sempozyum) | ||
| Bildiri Niteliği | Alanında Hakemli Uluslararası Kongre/Sempozyum | ||
| DOI Numarası | 10.5194/isprs-Archives-XLVI-4-W5-2021-137-2021 | ||
| Kongre Adı | The 6th International Conference on Smart City Applications | ||
| Kongre Tarihi | 27-10-2021 / 29-10-2021 | ||
| Basıldığı Ülke | Türkiye | Basıldığı Şehir | Safranbolu |
| Bildiri Linki | http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlvi-4-w5-2021-137-2021 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Makine Öğrenmesi
|
||
| Özet |
| The usage of computers and software in the biomedical field has been increasing and applications for doctors, clinicians, scientists and other users have been developed in the recent times. Manual, semi-automatic and fully automatic applications developed for bone fracture detection are one of the important studies in this field. Image segmentation, which is one of the image preprocessing steps in bone fracture detection, is an important step to obtain successful results with high accuracy. In this study, Otsu thresholding method, active contour method, k-means method, fuzzy c-mean method, Niblack thresholding method and max min thresholding range (MMTR) method are used on bone images obtained by Karabük University Training and Research Hospital. When any filters are not applied on images to remove noises, the most successful method is obtained by K-means method based on specificity and accuracy as 89,55% and 83,31% respectively. Niblack thresholding method has the highest sensitivity result as 92,45%. |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Bone Fracture | Fracture Diagnosis | Image Processing | Segmentation Methods | Thresholding |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Scopus | 2 |
| Google Scholar | 5 |