| Makale Türü |
|
||
| Dergi Adı | Cadmus | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 2038-5242 | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | |||
| Makale Dili | Türkçe | Basım Tarihi | 05-2019 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 3 / 6 / 163–177 | DOI | – |
| Makale Linki | https://cadmusjournal.org/files/pdfreprints/vol3issue6/Who-should-Govern-on-what-Principles-The%20Future-of-Decision-Making-ECepni-Cadmus-V3-I6.pdf | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Büyüme
Para-Banka
|
||
| Özet |
| The main aim of this paper is to discuss the theories of decision-making, the problems of predictions and how the tools utilized for the process of decision-making at the macro-level could be enhanced for policy makers in our post-normal times. Decision-making is the process of identifying and choosing alternatives based on the values and preferences of the decision maker deriving from several perspectives (psychological, cognitive, and normative). Decision theory (or the theory of choice) is the study of the reasoning that underlies the choices adopted by an agent. Normative (Prescriptive) decision theory gives advice on how to make the best decisions with a set of uncertain beliefs and a set of values. Descriptive (positive) decision theory analyses how existing, possibly irrational agents actually make decisions (Grunig and Kuhn, 2013). Political decisions or governmental policies are devised using the normative decision theory. The values, beliefs and ideas of policy makers inev... |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |