Rethinking UNCLOS dispute mechanisms: jurisdiction, sovereignty, and reform pathways through case law insights
Yazarlar (2)
Md Syful Islam Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye
Dr. Öğr. Üyesi Abu Saleh Mohammad Mahmudul HASAN Karabük Üniversitesi, Türkiye
| Makale Türü | Özgün Makale (SSCI, AHCI, SCI, SCI-Exp dergilerinde yayınlanan tam makale) | ||
| Dergi Adı | International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics (Q1) | ||
| Dergi ISSN | 1567-9764 Dergi Bilgileri (2025) | ||
| Dergi Tarandığı Indeksler | SSCI | ||
| Makale Dili | İngilizce | Basım Tarihi | 09-2025 |
| Cilt / Sayı / Sayfa | 25 / 4 / 539–574 | DOI | 10.1007/s10784-025-09690-0 |
| Makale Linki | https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-025-09690-0 | ||
| UAK Araştırma Alanları |
Uluslararası Hukuk
|
||
| Özet |
| This study critically examines the impact of dispute resolution mechanisms established by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the governance of the ocean, identifying gaps in understanding how these institutions shape state behavior and contribute to evolving legal principles. The research addresses the question: How do mechanisms under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea influence policies and compliance in the realm of international law of the sea? Key institutions, including the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, the International Court of Justice, and the International Seabed Authority, as well as arbitration and special tribunals, are analyzed to evaluate their effectiveness in resolving disputes and clarifying jurisdictional issues. Using a qualitative approach, the study analyzes landmark tribunal rulings, case law, and scholarly literature to highlight the … |
| Anahtar Kelimeler |
| Compliance mechanisms | Dispute settlement innovation | ITLOS jurisprudence | Maritime sovereignty | UNCLOS reform |
BM Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma Amaçları
| Atıf Sayıları | |
| Scopus | 2 |
| Google Scholar | 6 |